Table 1 (abstract A38). Attributes of the IDSP Surveillance System for Measles, Ghaziabad District, Uttar Pradesh, 2018
Attribute | Indicator | n/N | % |
|---|---|---|---|
Simplicity | Staff aware of case definition | 7/7 | 100 |
Staff found ease of reporting | 7/7 | 100 | |
Staff found ease of compilation of information | 5/5 | 100 | |
Ease of data analysis | 1/1 | 100 | |
Flexibility | Proportion of reporting units sending weekly report by email | 22/86 | 26 |
Acceptability | Staff willing to report in formats | 4/5 | 80 |
P and L forms submitted against expected by reporting units | 29/32 | 91 | |
S forms submitted against expected Feedback provided by the district surveillance unit to the reporting units | 0/16 0/8 | 0 0 | |
Data Quality | Completeness of P form | 24/24 | 100 |
Completeness of L form | 24/24 | 100 | |
Timeliness | Timeliness of report from sub-centre | 0/16 | 0 |
Timeliness of report from government reporting units | 15/16 | 93 | |
Timeliness of report from private facilities | 3/4 | 75 | |
Timeliness of report by district | 8/8 | 100 | |
Stability | Vacant positions | 0 | 0 |
Availability of computer and internet connection for reporting | Yes | ||
S forms | Not available | ||
Representativeness | Proportion of government facilities included in reporting network against expected | 62/68 | 91 |
Proportion of private facilities in reporting number against expected | 22/314 | 7 | |
Proportion of registered private laboratories included in reporting network | 22/228 | 9 |