Table 3 Performance of SIR in 20 groups with top 30 markers FDR = 20.8%
From: New insights into old methods for identifying causal rare variants
Group | Number of identified answers (A) | Number of candidate markers (B) | Ratio of A to B (%) | (B − A)/B (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 5 | 5 | 100.0 | 0.0 |
2 | 4 | 4 | 100.0 | 0.0 |
3 | 4 | 6 | 66.7 | 33.3 |
4 | 4 | 6 | 66.7 | 33.3 |
5 | 4 | 6 | 66.7 | 33.3 |
6 | 4 | 6 | 66.7 | 33.3 |
7 | 5 | 6 | 83.3 | 16.7 |
8 | 5 | 5 | 100.0 | 0.0 |
9 | 5 | 6 | 83.3 | 16.7 |
10 | 4 | 5 | 80.0 | 20.0 |
11 | 4 | 4 | 100.0 | 0.0 |
12 | 4 | 5 | 80.0 | 20.0 |
13 | 6 | 8 | 75.0 | 25.0 |
14 | 3 | 4 | 75.0 | 25.0 |
15 | 4 | 6 | 66.7 | 33.3 |
16 | 3 | 4 | 75.0 | 25.0 |
17 | 5 | 6 | 83.3 | 16.7 |
18 | 6 | 7 | 85.7 | 14.3 |
19 | 4 | 5 | 80.0 | 20.0 |
20 | 3 | 6 | 50.0 | 50.0 |