Session | Title | Activity description |
---|---|---|
3 | Writing an article that is fit for purpose using a reporting guideline | Peer review and assessment of fit for purpose writing of a published cohort study through application of the STROBE reporting guideline |
4 | Tools for Transparency | Familiarization with Open Science Framework and ORCID to promote transparency in research methodology |
6 | Selective reporting: Detection, consequences and solutions | Detection of selective reporting by comparing reported outcomes in a published study protocol versus the published clinical trial report |
10 | Patient engagement roundtable and networking event | Attendees rotated between three tables led by two faculty each and brain-stormed ideas and thoughts on (1) Why engage patients and barriers to engagement; (2) When to engage patients and how to report in manuscripts/reports; and (3) How to identify patients and engage patients. Attendees voted at each table on the top five take-home messages and nominated a table “reporter” to present their results to the course attendees during Session 16. |
15 | Fees, predatory journals, open access, and traditional publication models | In groups, attendees applied their understanding of predatory journals in an examination of three faculty-selected journal articles |
16 | Engaging patients and parents: From design to publication | Group discussion on engaging patients and parents, with student presentation of take-home lessons learned from Session 10 |